sjson has just gone applicative. I have changed the typeclasses for reading and writing jsons so that the typeclass protocols now return applicatives instead of raw types. Of course this makes the protocols composable with any other applicative based API in the world. This is the advantage of programming with generic abstractions like functors, applicatives and monads - you can compose them readily with any API that the world has written using the same ones.
Previously the serialization typeclasses for sjson looked like ..
// takes a type and produces a Json abstraction
trait Writes[T] {
def writes(o: T): JsValue
}
// reads a json abstraction and produces T
trait Reads[T] {
def reads(json: JsValue): T
}
You can compose
writes and reads together only through function composition since they have symmetric type signatures. But you cannot get the benefits of threading additional effectful computations through them. e.g. I cannot accumulate errors generically in reads that result from mismatches in the field names between the json structure and the Scala type. Or I cannot plugin additional validations on Json structures during de-serialization into Scala type and have the validation messages passed on to the client. I need to have specialized handling in my code base by resorting to side-effects like throwing exceptions, which don't compose well.In sjsonapp, the typeclasses are changed to ..
trait Writes[T] {
def writes(o: T): ValidationNEL[String, JsValue]
}
trait Reads[T] {
def reads(json: JsValue): ValidationNEL[String, T]
}
scalaz defines an applicative functor named
Validation that allows you to compose validating abstractions. I had discussed in detail how you can compose domain models using applicative functors like Validation in an earlier post. You can use Validation to accumulate errors that occur when you de-serialize a Json structure into a Scala object.Applicative Composition FTW
Here's the immediate impact of making your APIs return an applicative - your json processing becomes a composable pipeline of abstractions. Here's an example of an identity operation where you serialize Scala objects into json and de-serialize them back into the same abstractions using applicative composition ..
describe("Serialize and compose applicatives") {
it("should compose and form a bigger ADT") {
case class Address(no: String, street: String, zip: String)
implicit val AddressFormat: Format[Address] =
asProduct3("no", "street", "zip")(Address)(Address.unapply(_).get)
case class Name(firstName: String, lastName: String)
implicit val NameFormat: Format[Name] =
asProduct2("firstName", "lastName")(Name)(Name.unapply(_).get)
case class Me(name: Name, age: Int, address: Address)
implicit val MeFormat: Format[Me] =
asProduct3("name", "age", "address")(Me)(Me.unapply(_).get)
val name = Name("debasish", "ghosh")
val address = Address("1050/2", "Survey Park", "700075")
val me = Me(name, 40, address)
fromjson[Me](tojson(me).toOption.get) should equal(me.success)
(tojson(name) |@| tojson(address) |@| tojson(40)) {(nm, add, age) =>
(fromjson[Name](nm) |@| fromjson[Address](add) |@| fromjson[Int](age)) {(n, ad, ag) => Me(n, ag, ad)}
} should equal(Success(Success(me)))
}
}
Accumulating Validation Errors
Here's a test snippet that demonstrates how you can get back validation errors in a List when de-serializing a Json structure that's supposed to make a Scala object ..
case class Person(firstName: String, lastName: String, gender: String, age: Int)
implicit val PersonFormat: Format[Person] =
asProduct4("firstName", "lastName", "gender", "age")(Person)(Person.unapply(_).get)
val pjson = """{"FirstName" : "Debasish", "LastName" : "Ghosh", "gender": "M", "age": 40}"""
fromjson[Person](Js(pjson)).fail.toOption.get.list
should equal(List("field firstName not found", "field lastName not found"))
The power of composition with applicatives .. and note we don't use any side-effecting operations like throwing exceptions which eschews purity of your functions. The accumulation is powered by a
Semigroup abstraction that constrains the error part of the Validation. Have a look at how the applicative for Validation constrains X to be a Semigroup in scalaz and accumulates the failures in the last clause of the pattern match ..implicit def ValidationApply[X: Semigroup]: Apply[({type λ[α]=Validation[X, α]})#λ] =
new Apply[({type λ[α]=Validation[X, α]})#λ] {
def apply[A, B](f: Validation[X, A => B], a: Validation[X, A]) = (f, a) match {
case (Success(f), Success(a)) => success(f(a))
case (Success(_), Failure(e)) => failure(e)
case (Failure(e), Success(_)) => failure(e)
case (Failure(e1), Failure(e2)) => failure(e1 |+| e2)
}
}
Besides mismatches in field names, you can also plug in custom validation functions that will be invoked during de-serialization of your json structures and report similar errors when they fail .. Here's an example ..
case class Person(firstName: String, lastName: String, gender: String, age: Int)
val validGender: String => ValidationNEL[String, String] = {g =>
if (g == "M" || g == "F") g.success else "gender must be M or F".fail.liftFailNel
}
val validAge: Int => ValidationNEL[String, Int] = {a =>
if (a < 0 || a > 100) "age must be positive and < 100".fail.liftFailNel else a.success
}
// the typeclass implementation for Person
implicit val PersonFormat: Format[Person] = new Format[Person] {
// the de-serializing function
def reads(json: JsValue): ValidationNEL[String, Person] = json match {
case m@JsObject(_) =>
(field[String]("firstName", m) |@|
field[String]("lastName", m) |@|
field[String]("gender", m, validGender) |@| // validation plugin
field[Int]("age", m, validAge)) { Person }
case _ => "JsObject expected".fail.liftFailNel
}
// the serializing function
//..
}
Note how we plug in the validations for
gender and age into the typeclass instance for Person. Also note that these functions also return an instance of scalaz Validation which can be nicely composed with the return type of the reads function after constructing the instance of the Person class. Here's an example ..val p = Person("ghosh", "debasish", "M", 27)
fromjson[Person](tojson(p).toOption.get) should equal(p.success)
val r = Person("ghosh", "debasish", "G", 270)
fromjson[Person](tojson(r).toOption.get).fail.toOption.get.list should
equal(List("gender must be M or F", "age must be positive and < 100"))
Applicatives open up a world of possibilities
Once you have your APIs based on applicatives you can use all other abstractions that applicative functors offer - e.g. you can compose validations using Kleislis ..
describe("Serialize and chain validate using Kleisli") {
case class Me(firstName: String, lastName: String, age: Int, no: String, street: String, zip: String)
implicit val MeFormat: Format[Me] =
asProduct6("firstName", "lastName", "age", "no", "street", "zip")(Me)(Me.unapply(_).get)
val positive: Int => ValidationNEL[String, Int] =
(i: Int) => if (i > 0) i.success else "must be +ve".fail.liftFailNel
val min: Int => ValidationNEL[String, Int] =
(i: Int) => if (i > 10) i.success else "must be > 10".fail.liftFailNel
val max: Int => ValidationNEL[String, Int] =
(i: Int) => if (i < 100) i.success else "must be < 100".fail.liftFailNel
it("should serialize and validate") {
val me = Me("debasish", "ghosh", 30, "1050/2", "survey park", "700075")
val json = tojson(me)
import Validation.Monad._
type VA[A] = ValidationNEL[String, A]
field[Int]("age", json.toOption.get,
kleisli[VA, Int, Int](positive) >=>
kleisli[VA, Int, Int](min) >=> kleisli[VA, Int, Int](max)) should equal(30.success)
val me1 = me.copy(age = 300)
val json1 = tojson(me1)
field[Int]("age", json1.toOption.get,
kleisli[VA, Int, Int](positive) >=>
kleisli[VA, Int, Int](min) >=> kleisli[VA, Int, Int](max)).fail.toOption.get.list
should equal(List("must be < 100"))
}
}
The new version of sjson with all the applicative based APIs is available in a separate repository sjsonapp on my github. Another interesting development that will soon be available is pluggable backend for sjson. The current version (branch master) uses dispatch as the json processing backend. I am working towards making sjsonapp compatible with RosettaJson, so that you can use pluggable json processing backends like LiftJson, Dispatch or BlueEyes. The current RosettaJson compatible version is available in the branch rosetta - feel free to checkout and play with it.
